Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
The most pro-casual Magic: the Gathering blog on the internet since 2008!

Retrospectives, part 7: Homelands

October 23rd 2010 23:20
“Finally, I understand. Home isn’t where you rest. It’s what you fight for.”
-- Elspeth Tirel

If you started playing in the last ten years or so, you have probably heard of Homelands, despite its antiquity. It is widely considered the weakest set in the history of Magic – in the early days of Standard, there was a rule that you had to include at least one card from every set legal in the format, which was made largely because Homelands was well below the power level of the rest of the format. It has become a by-word for underpowered cards and poor design, with Mark Rosewater going so far as to cite it as one of the game’s greatest mistakes.


But if you started playing in the decade before that, especially around the time of Homelands’ release in 1995, your view of it may be a lot less negative. Its mechanical weakness was nowhere near as pronounced as it is now, given the much smaller card pool and relative unpopularity of organized play. At the time, many players were content to appreciate the storyline, the artwork, and the characters shown in the cards. And the fact remains that even if Standard players hadn’t been forced to play with Homelands, the cards they chose probably would have seen play anyway. Ihsan’s Shade was nearly unkillable in that era, Eron the Relentless and Autumn Willow were (and technically still are) efficiently costed, and Serrated Arrows bent the color pie in much the same was as Nevinyrral’s Disk did.

Ihsan's Shade


Eron the Relentless

Autumn Willow

Serrated Arrows


And no matter when you started playing, you can easily see the problems in Rosewater criticizing Homelands (and other early sets) for their flavor-based design, then, albeit a few years later, writing a State of Design article where he praises flavor-based design and talks about the need to bring “resonance” to expansion sets. I have to state up front that there is nothing wrong with changing his position per se – Magic lives and dies by the fans who appreciate Autumn Willow and Malfegor more than those who chase after Force of Will and Umezawa’s Jitte. But if Wizards of the Coast’s position has changed, then it’s time to make that position consistent, to rehabilitate the early expansions. Sometimes, you can go home again.
100
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
153 Posts dating from March 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Jose's Blogs

7896 Vote(s)
55 Comment(s)
85 Post(s)
Moderated by Jose
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]